Have the Baltics Entered a Recession?

[Update added below: Stefan Karlsson responds to the recent data from the Baltics noting that we are now definitely in a recession (although I am not sure that Estonia contracted in Q1 2008 while Latvia and Lithuania certainly did); as for the recession call ... he may very well be right.]

Last Friday Macro Man was looking for pink flamingos or more aptly as he put it:

"(...) what's the next pink flamingo, if any? Where are the remaining high conviction, deeply-positioned trades that might get washed out by the hand of fate (and/or the tap on the shoulder from the market risk manager?)"
Consulting the commentary section in MM's post you could easily get the idea that financial markets are awash with pink flamingos. Commodities seem to be taking a center stage at this point in time. However, I have another bid for that pink flamingo. I hardly think that many a hedge fund manager and money mover are exposed to Lithuania but they may be exposed to Eastern Europe in general since this is where some of the highest growth rates have been during the recent global expansion. Most economists have agreed for some time that the Eastern European edifice would slow down significantly and moreover that certain countries harbored a substantial amount of risk with respect to the stability of the existing currency regime. Hungary and its recent abandonment of the Forint's peg to the Euro is a case in point. Yet, the main venue of debate amongst economists and commentators has been whether Eastern Europe and its specific countries would experience a hard or soft landing (see these posts in particular). Here at Alpha.Sources I have had a tendency to lean towards the former scenario. More specifically I have been looking at the Baltics and especially Lithuania as a way to gauge how the economic fundamentals were fairing. In this light, it now seems as if the hard landers are slowly getting the upper hand; at least when it comes to the Baltics.

As any mildly astute economist will know it is extremely difficult to call the exact turning point of the cycle and thus the point in time where a recession starts. Usually, such issues are resolved post mortem when the economic data has been firmly revised. Moreover, the actual determination of a slowdown's or a recession's starting point also quickly turns into a battle royal between economists as the alphabet soup of different national account measures easily ties up the discussion as we end up comparing apples and pairs. However, at this point in time I don't think we have the luxury to engage in such a battle among economic gentlemen. I don't think so because the Baltics' (and many of the other Eastern European countries') situation is a bit more complex than your average US type recession where a you clean up the mess with a couple of quarters of negative growth. What we consequently need to understand is that, depending on the turn of events and response from markets, the current slowdown may turn out to have quite far reaching consequences for the region. With these ominous remarks let us turn to the evidence suggesting that the tide is now finally turning in the Baltics. In fact, we can only at this point say something decisive about Latvia and Lithuania since Estonia has not yet posted Q1 08 figures. The pace of growth however has been consistently lower in Estonia throughout 2007 compared to 2006 and in Q4 Estonia posted a growth rate of 0.9% q-o-q which is of course more than respectable but a significant slowdown in relative terms. What remains to be seen now is whether Estonia will kick off 2008 with negative growth rates or just eek out a positive showing. Indicators for retail sales suggest that Estonia may be lagging Latvia so I would not be surprised if Estonian Q1 is positive on a q-o-q basis. In the context of Latvia my colleague Edward Hugh has been keeping a watchful eye. Back in March he asked the question of whether we were heading into a recession in Q4 2007? At the time, strong circumstantial suggested that this was the case and now with the recent flash estimate from Q1 it is safe to say the coffin has now been supplied the final nails;

(...) in constant price terms - Latvian GDP hit a peak at some point between Q2 and Q3 2007 (lets say August 2007) and since that time has been steadily CONTRACTING. Now I know there are probably hundreds of different ways of skinning a chicken, and of course you can read data everywhichway you want to, and there are seasonal factors to take into account, but as far as I am concerned there is no getting away from it, on any reasonable criterion the Latvian economy is now in recession, and has been since the middle of last year.

This leaves us with Lithuania and consequently my little fetish here at Alpha.Sources in looking at this small Baltic economy. Since we just recently got Q1 2008 GDP figures (provisional estimates too I would imagine) we should have a fairly strong picture of what is going on. First, we will have the visual inspection;

As can be observed in the figure above Lithuania stalled sharply from Q3 to Q4 and now posting a contraction in Q1 08 on a q-o-q basis. On a y-o-y basis the economy is still growing but this figure is basically pointless in so far as goes the determination of where the economy is at in the present time. The first graph speaks for itself and in this context the two additional graphs plotting the indexed values of GDP do not really add much to the general picture. I still think they have merit though. Especially the last one is interesting as it shows the 'momentum' of the slowdown. Basically the chart shows the rate of expansion relative to the previous period without saying anything about the level of growth (which is shown in graph number two).

In Summary

I have been very cautious in pulling out the R-word in connection with the Baltics let alone Eastern European in general. I still am. However, what is clear at this point is that we are now observing a hard landing. The rate of the slowdown since it began in the middle of 2007 leaves no other conclusion I think. What happens next then? This question is not at all insignificant. What we now have on our hands in the Baltics is, in macroeconomic terms, quite a predicament. Basically, the economic momentum now seems to be unwinding far too fast relative to the pace by which the inherent imbalances present in these economies can be expected to respond. Large external deficits and pegging currencies here are important since it means that the latter cannot adjust. The only possible alternative if the rout continues is consequently a transition into price and wage deflation. It is still early to say whether this will materialize but it is now a real risk rather than a theoretical possibility. Additionally, we now need to watch all those foreign banks who have set up shop across the Baltics helping to finance all those credit inflows. Will they stay or more specifically can they afford to? This is also now a question which must be considered as more than an academic question.

I am really sorry to start this week on such a nasty note but I do think that the genie is out of the bottle in the context of the Baltics. Now we need to watch carefully where it goes from here. If economic momentum (or lack thereof) continues to linger in the current territory we should be a prepared for a rapid change of fundamentals in the Baltics.