monetary policy — Alpha.Sources

Crowding out and AI debt issuance

Analysts and economist are, broadly speaking, offering up four separate reasons for the continued rise in developed market, and in particular, US bond yields. A resurgence in inflation due to the negative supply shock in global energy markets as a result of the US-Iran war, loose fiscal policy with little or no credible plan for any near-term consolidation, a reflection of improving underlying growth and rising productivity—linked to the AI investment boom—lifting the real neutral rate for “the right” reasons, and more specifically in the context of AI, rapidly accelerating AI debt issuance “crowding out” government debt issuance, lifting the cost of capital for the sovereign.

The idea that AI debt issuance is now a key driver of rising bond yields via a “crowding out” effect has captured a lot of attention in recent weeks with key Wall Street analysts and publications offering evidence to support the claim. The FT’s Toby Nangle, however, is not so sure, and in a recent FT Alphaville piece he sets out to rebut the claim.

Fiscal dominance is here, or is it?

One of the more useful AI tools that I have set up recently is a bi-weekly macro and demographics theme scout, which collects material on a given topic and runs through a number of recent and older sources, and synthesises this material into a brief essay, as well as a text to speech (TTS) document so that I listen back with the ElevenLabs text-to-speech app.

I thought it might be useful to recycle some of this material on the blog. One of the topics my AI scout landed on earlier this year was fiscal dominance, and whether developed markets are now slipping into this regime after a long period in which monetary dominance—activist monetary and passive fiscal policy—was the norm. I would frame the question like this. Has fiscal largesse during Covid, the subsequent fiscal support to protect against sequential global supply shocks in energy, and more generally deglobalisation and a focus the government balance sheet as a strategic lever for economic security pushed monetary policy into a Sargent and Wallace world of "unpleasant arithmetic”?

Here is the essay with some additions by me and more recent contributions.

A look at the bright side

I detect a lot of worry about the global economic outlook. This is understandable. Equities are close to, or at, record highs with extended valuations. Growth fears have crept higher on investors’ list of concerns, most notably with signs of softness in the US labour market as well as persistently weak domestic demand in Europe. Add a still-fragile Chinese economy to the mix, despite hopes of stimulus, and the prospect of a leap in economic uncertainty after next month’s US presidential elections, it is no wonder investors are on edge. But what if I told you that global leading indicators are strong and healthy and that combined with falling inflation and falling interest rates, this is one of the best macro-setups for risk assets. I suspect many would reply that such tailwinds already are comfortably priced-in to equity and credit markets. I am sympathetic to that point, but hear me out.

Things to think about #1

Why are central banks targeting 2% inflation, and should they? This question seems to be on a lot of people’s minds at the moment, as it should given the likely difficulty in an achieving a perfect landing in inflation at 2%. Bloomberg’s Marcus Ashworth even asks the question that I suspect many economists or investors are thinking about at the moment; should the 2% inflation target be retired? And if so, how?

02

Alpha Sources Blog