The more I think about the current debate about inflation, the more I am inclined towards the following remarkable conclusion. We currently do not have a good framework to explain inflation, neither cyclically nor structurally. Perhaps more appropriately, the old consensus among economists and policymakers on what inflation is, how it arises, and what to do about it has been severely challenged, if not shattered entirely. In a post-pandemic world of a clear, and almost textbook, inflationary mismatch between demand and supply, this has created the odd situation in which everyone is talking about inflation, and more recently inflation expectations, concluding that it either doesn’t matter or that we don’t understand how inflation works in the first place. Nowhere is this clearer than in the debate about whether presently high inflation is transitory or not. The thrust of this discussion has as much to do with the main interlocutors convincing each other that high inflation doesn’t matter, as it is about agreeing on what, in fact, transitory means.
Read MoreHaving just spent ten days on the beach in Ibiza, I am able to provide strong circumstantial evidence that European tourism is back, at least for a while. Granted, the clubs—which I am now too old to go to anyway—are still closed, but hotels, restaurants and beaches were full as ever. Given that 80-to-90% of activity on the island takes place outside, in a sunny and relatively windy coastal environment, the virus wasn't much of a threat, even though numbers had been climbing prior to our arrival. Indoor mask mandates, which are now commonplace, really was the only sign of the virus as far as we were concerned, notwithstanding having to navigate the byzantine testing and tracking rules for travel. The Dutch nurse who performed our pre-travel Covid-test informed me and my wife that tour operators on the island had hoped that August this year would see activity levels return to 50% of its 2019 level, before claiming that the true number is closer to 80%, and that operators are expecting to extend the season into October. If that's true, it adds to the evidence that economic activity in Europe will improve further in the next few months. That’s good news.
Read MoreInvestors remain locked in discussion about the same issues they were mulling before the holidays. The rollout of the vaccine—however frustratingly slow in some countries—means that the light at the end of the tunnel for the economy is probably not an oncoming train. That’s great news, but the counterpoint is that markets have long since priced-in such an outcome, leaving investors vulnerable to the famous adage that if they’re buying the rumour, they’re also likely to sell the fact. In that vein, I am happy to double down on my comments at the end of last year that you should now be looking to stash away profits rather than putting new money to work. On that occasion I showed two charts to warn about incoming multiple contraction in equities, proxied by valuations on the S&P 500, and my in-house valuation score, which is also headed for the basement. The first chart on the next page shows that the six-month stock-to-bond return ratio in the U.S. remains pinned close to cyclical highs, also hinting that equities are about to give up some of their recent gains, with bonds rallying in appreciation. The second chart shows what happened the last time stock-to-bond returns were this stretched. It occurred in the run-up to the Flash Crash in 2010, before the swoon in the summer of 2011, ahead of the drawdown in May 2012, not to mention during the Taper Tantrum in 2013. Based on this albeit short sample, investors should brace for volatility in H1.
Read MoreFinancial journalists have had to resort to clichés in the past few weeks to describe the reality that they’re being paid to report on. At the start of December, Financial Times’ Robin Wigglesworth invoked the “everything rally” to describe a market "too hot to handle”, while Bloomberg’s Marcus Ashworth and Mark Gilbert have gone for the idea that markets will “defy gravity”, again, in 2021. The industry’s most widely watched investor survey— the BofA's GMFS—chimes in with the observation that "asset allocators are underweight cash first time since May’13; triggering FMS Cash Rule “sell signal,” a sentiment supported by the opening line in ASR’s recent study; “this is the most bullish result we have seen in the six year running our asset allocation survey.” The bull market in equities is paved with the irrelevance of such skeptical analysis, but sometimes the truth is in fact staring you in the face. This market is flirting with danger, and will soon suffer a significant correction. The more pertinent question, however, is whether I, or anyone else, have the tools or wherewithal to pick a tradable top, and following from that, whether a correction will mark the beginning of a more sustained downturn in equities, and other financial asset prices? As far as the first question is concerned, luck is a thing, but trying to pick even relatively obvious intermediate tops in this market isn’t easy. As a friend on the buy-side likes to remind me; “my put options are melting like butter in the microwave.” In terms of a more dramatic shift in the trend and narrative, we won’t be able to perceive it when it happens, but I don’t think such a shift is imminent.
Read More