Dani Rodrik is disappointed with the way the world is responding to Mr. Trump’s wrecking-ball foreign and economic policy. Professor Rodrik opens with the argument that Trump’s policies are “misguided, erratic, and self-defeating,” lamenting that the rest of the world is only feebly resisting—failing to recognize that “imperialism must always be challenged – not accommodated – and that [this] requires both power and purpose.”
Read MoreI’ve been sitting on this project for a while, but I’m finally ready to bring it above the fold. I’ve long wanted a straightforward overview of global debt levels—both public and private—and an easy way to compare them across countries, alongside their respective external dynamics. This is essential material for macro investors and researchers, yet it’s rare to find all the relevant information compiled in one place. The AS global debt chartbook is a first attempt at this. Like the LEI Chartbook, this project runs on Python code generated and compiled with the help of my trusty OpenAI assistant, with a few manual adjustments along the way. At the moment, it draws data from an Excel spreadsheet, but integrating APIs should be relatively straightforward down the line.
Read MoreThe June 2025 edition of the global LEI chartbook can be found here. Additional details on the methodology are available here.
Global leading indicators improved further at the end of Q2, as markets and decision-makers in the real economy concluded that Mr. Trump’s tariff threats are more bark than bite. However, the U.S. President has since rekindled his appetite for tariffs, unveiling several high-profile measures targeting Asian economies, along with the weekend bombshell of a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico and Europe.
Read MoreGlobal leading indicators were stabilizing midway through Q2, exposing the tension between macroeconomic forecasts—many of which still anticipate a significant slowdown in the second half of the year—and incoming data and market signals that suggest the trade wars, or at least the most deleterious effect of this threat, are a thing of the past. The White House will bluster, but is likely to avoid imposing growth- or market-damaging policies on a sustained basis. Underlying this assumption is the expectation that the U.S. administration will not jeopardize the privileges conferred by issuing the world’s dominant reserve currency and commanding the deepest and most liquid capital markets globally.
Read More