It's little over a year ago that that I almost choked on my coffee when I read in the FT that Blackrock, one of the world’s largest asset managers, was recommending investors to increase their allocation to Chinese equities and bonds. This wasn’t because I thought this was a bad investment, per se, The comment by Wei Li, chief investment strategist at Blackrock, that Chinese assets are under-represented in portfolios given the relative size of China’s financial market is probably true. More interestingly, in a world where (some) economists are worried about the imbalanced trade relationship between the US and China—due mainly to subdued Chinese domestic demand and excessive savings—a reversal in capital flows between the world’s major economies is exactly what the doctor ordered. This is especially the case if, as is customarily hoped, it coincides with a liberalisation of and the opening of China’s capital account, and more freely floating CNY.
Read MoreIn my last view on markets, I asked whether inflation fears had peaked? Judging by the price action since, the answer would seem to be yes, tentatively. It’s a cliché, but true. Markets trade at the very thin margin of the flow of economic information, and this edge has shifted in the past month. Inflation is still high, but it is no longer accelerating rapidly, and evidence of increasingly fragile economic activity is piling up. The headline surveys have weakened materially, especially in Europe, and we recently learned that the US economy entered a technical recession in the first half of the year. For markets, this means monetary policy tightening will be less pervasive, both in terms of speed and sustainability. Upside inflation surprises now are associated with sharp flattening, even inversion, of interest rate curves, as markets perceive the window for policy tightening closing, fast.
Read MoreWhether you’re an evolutionary biologist, cultural sociologist or a neoclassical economist, the study of human fertility behaviour can be boiled down to an interplay between two immovable forces: the quantum and tempo effect. The first treats the fundamental question of reproduction; how many children to have, and how much resources to invest in each of them. In its simplest form, the quantum effect is the study of how much, if at all, women exert control over the quantity of offspring they produce. The extent to which they do—and almost all disciplines agree that they do in most social contexts—the analysis focuses on the conditions that determine the number of children, and how much resources that are devoted to each of them. It is an analysis of trade-offs, concentrated on the trade-off between the quantity and quality of offspring. How this balance is achieved represents one of the most crucial processes in the study of reproduction, aggregate fertility, and the demographic transition.
Read MoreI don’t have a definitive answer to the question posed above, but I think it is fair to say that markets traded last week as if the answer is: ‘yes’. In Europe, bund yields plunged below 1.5%, after touching almost 2% earlier in the month, and Dec-22 euribor futures are now pricing-in 50bp less tightening than immediately after the June ECB meeting. The catalyst: a below-consensus PMI report and news that Russia is slowly, but surely turning off gas supply to Europe. In the UK, bond yields have fallen too, in response to a below-consensus core CPI print. And finally, in the US, Jerome Powell’s comment, in a testimony to Congress, that a recession is ‘a possibility’ as the Fed embarks on a series of rate hikes, and QT, similarly drove down bond yields across the curve.
Read More