I am combining the April and May updates to the LEI Chartbook into a single edition, which, in hindsight, seems like a good decision. Leading indicators showed broad-based weakness in April, but I was sceptical that this deterioration would survive revisions. The May batch, meanwhile, confirms the weakness—and then some. Revisions could still alter the story, but as of May the key message is clear: global LEIs are now on the cusp of a broad-based downturn, having otherwise remained resilient in the face of geopolitical uncertainty and, in particular, volatile US economic and foreign policy.
Read MoreThe March update of the global LEI chartbook confirms that a broad-based upturn in global cyclical activity has been underway since the end of the third quarter of last year. However, the data show hints of weakness at the end of Q1, with the number of positive LEIs sitting at 14 out of 20—unchanged from a downwardly revised level in February and below the average of 16 recorded between September and January. This deterioration comes before leading indicators have had to contend with the chaos wrought by the war in Iran and disruptions to energy and commodity flows through the Strait of Hormuz and, more broadly, across the Middle East.
Read MoreThe February update of the global LEI chartbook confirms that a broad-based upturn in global cyclical activity has been underway since the end of the third quarter last year. Granted, the number of LEIs currently in expansion—16—is slightly lower than at previous cyclical peaks. However, the February update and revisions point to a stabilising expansion at this rate, which remains robust overall.
The big question now is whether the upturn will falter in the face of the energy price shock ignited by the war in Iran.
Time will tell.
Read MoreEquities have wobbled a bit at the start of the month, but unless they lose the plot in coming weeks, it is fair to say that Q1 will be everything that Q4 wasn’t; decent and calm. Indeed, the finer details reveal an even more striking dichotomy with the calamity that culminated in the rout at the end of last year. Between June—when the PE multiple peaked at just under 21—and the low for the S&P 500 in the final weak of December, EPS rose by 13%, but the index fell by 10%. In other words, the multiple crashed, a story which was repeated across almost all key DM and EM indices. By contrast, the story so far in Q1 is the exact opposite. By my calculation, trailing EPS for the S&P 500 and MSCI World are down 0.5% and 2.1% year-to-date, respectively, but both indices have rallied smartly. This can only mean one thing; multiples have expanded, and they have indeed, by about 14% in both cases since the end of December. I am confident that the tug-of-war between multiple expansion and deteriorating earnings will determine the fate of many equity investors in 2019.
Read More